[Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5417





------- Comment #6 from virginia.smith@hp.com  2008-02-19 18:34 -------
+1 for the proposal with the following editorial suggestions:

- change title of 6.3.1 to "Content of {rules} Property"

- section 6.3.1, para 2 - change "can be" to "MAY be"

- either remove "Rules" from title of sections 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 or replace with
"Assessment". The goal is to use rule in section 6 only when referring to
schematron constraints. For consistency, we could consider changing other
section titles from "Rules" to "Assessment" or to remove "Rules" entirely from
the section titles (e.g., in subsections of section 5)


- change 1st sentence in 6.3.2 from:
Model validators  MUST enforce the following rules.

to:

Model validators  MUST enforce the following:

Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 18:34:47 UTC