- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 05:07:18 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5416 kumarp@microsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|editorial |needsReview ------- Comment #5 from kumarp@microsoft.com 2008-02-03 05:07 ------- [1] Did not modify table 4-2. [2] Added the following text below the table: Note that, 1. if an element instance is not an SML reference, then the validity rules are considered trivially satisfied for that instance in that there is no element that would invalidate the rules. 2. "Check" in the table above means that the appropriate constraint must be evaluated. [3] I checked the acyclic constraint section. It has similar writing style and the same structure as the target* constraints (i.e., Mapping from Schema/Schema Validity Rules/Instance Validity Rules). I am not sure how it is written quite differently as mentioned in the 1/31 minutes. If a change to the acyclic section is desired, some clarification will help the editors. I have not changed anything in that section at this time.
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2008 05:07:23 UTC