- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:53:14 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5406 ------- Comment #12 from kirk.wilson@ca.com 2008-02-16 20:53 ------- Additional, one further thing I think the WG should discuss regarding the changes to the SML spec: section 4.2.2 contains a statement about SML references that CONTAIN multiple reference schemes. I understand from Sandy that his resolution to the issue regarding the meaning of "SML Reference" (Sandy's proposal that resolved about 10 issues on this one concept) precluded the use of "contain" or "include" to describe the relationship between a SML reference and a SML reference scheme.
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2008 20:53:19 UTC