public-sml@w3.org from February 2008 by author

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Friday, 29 February)
• [Bug 5506] Link name for 5.5 Schema Document Bindings (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute (Wednesday, 27 February)
• [Bug 5500] primaryAlias is overloaded (Friday, 22 February)
• [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported (Friday, 22 February)
• [Bug 5500] primaryAlias is overloaded (Friday, 22 February)
• [Bug 5501] LC publication related editorial fixes (Friday, 22 February)
• [Bug 5501] LC publication related editorial fixes (Friday, 22 February)
• [Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head (Friday, 22 February)
• [Bug 5500] primaryAlias is overloaded (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5498] Use of term 'vacuous' (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5498] Use of term 'vacuous' (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5498] Use of term 'vacuous' (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5497] Consistent Model Validation title (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified? (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5494] inherit schematron constraints from the substitution group head (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5491] typo in IF 4.4 Schema Binding, last paragraph (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5491] typo in IF 4.4 Schema Binding, last paragraph (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5490] wrong syntax for XML comments in pseudo-schema (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [Bug 5478] 4.1 Packaging lacks base64data discussion (Monday, 18 February)
• [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f (Sunday, 17 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5485] misc editorial fixes in SML spec (Saturday, 16 February)
• [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5481] inconsistent indentation in examples (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5481] inconsistent indentation in examples (Friday, 15 February)
• [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5410] Repeating schematron specification contents (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified? (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5417] inconsistent lists of constructs where rules are supported (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5410] Repeating schematron specification contents (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5479] edits discussed at Jan f2f (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5478] 4.1 Packaging lacks base64data discussion (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints" (Thursday, 14 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5409] Clarify use of term 'rule' in SML specification (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF" (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5475] Add acknowledgement sections to match SML spec (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [Bug 5306] SML-IF header information (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [Bug 5423] 2.2 terminology (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Friday, 8 February)
• [Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints" (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5461] Definition of model validation needs wordsmithing (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5388] Definition of "Reference" (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5388] Definition of "Reference" (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5463] Must conforming producers be able to spin straw into gold? (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5461] Definition of model validation needs wordsmithing (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5418] conformance criteria: "valid if" vs "valid if AND ONLY IF" (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5406] Use "model validator" term consistently; drop "conforming" (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5461] Definition of model validation needs wordsmithing (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints" (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5457] remove normative dependence on xpointer() scheme (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5430] Confusing sentence in 6. Localization of natural-language messages (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5438] confusing sentence in 5.2 SML-IF Documents (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5405] Binding of Schematron constraints to elements or documents (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5403] Remove "user-defined" from "user-defined constraints" (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative (Thursday, 7 February)
• [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified? (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [Bug 5450] register smlxpath1() scheme with XPointer registry (Wednesday, 6 February)
• [Bug 5448] Update code samples to use the smlxpath1() scheme (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5447] Model validation term defined twice (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Monday, 4 February)
• [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications (Sunday, 3 February)
• [Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents (Sunday, 3 February)
• [Bug 5419] 5.5 Schema Document Bindings unclear which bits are optional/not (Saturday, 2 February)
• [Bug 5424] 4. SML References awkward wording (Saturday, 2 February)
• [Bug 5415] clarify acyclic definition (Saturday, 2 February)
• [Bug 5437] 5.1.1 Using the SML-IF Version Attribute (Saturday, 2 February)
• [Bug 5442] extra information in sml-if-schema.xsd (Friday, 1 February)
• [Bug 5395] Normative discussion of schemaComplete (Friday, 1 February)
• [Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents (Friday, 1 February)
• [Bug 5428] unclear passages (Friday, 1 February)
• [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections (Friday, 1 February)
• [Bug 5429] minor(?) corrections (Friday, 1 February)
• [Bug 5443] section 4.3.1.1 point 4 open to misinterpretation (Friday, 1 February)
• [Bug 5400] Clarification of deref() needed (Friday, 1 February)
• [Bug 5407] Explicitly mentioning dependent spec version numbers (Friday, 1 February)

John Arwe

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-22 SML Telecon (Thursday, 21 February)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-21 SML Telecon (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-14 SML Telecon (Wednesday, 20 February)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-14 SML Teleconference (Wednesday, 13 February)

Kumar Pandit

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-21 SML Teleconference (Tuesday, 26 February)
• RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Wednesday, 20 February)
• FW: [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-02-07 SML (Thursday, 7 February)
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-31 SML Teleconference (Thursday, 7 February)

Lynn, James (HP Software)

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-02-07 SML Teleconference (Tuesday, 12 February)
• RE: [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Tuesday, 5 February)

Pratul Dublish

• Please review LC drafts (Tuesday, 12 February)
• RE: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Friday, 8 February)
• RE: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Friday, 8 February)

Sandy Gao

• Re: sml:ref vs xlink (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: [Bug 5462] Can sml:nilref="true" be specified on a non-SML reference? (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative (Thursday, 7 February)

Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

• RE: [SML] is this text a note (non-normative) or not? (Thursday, 21 February)
• [SML] is this text a note (non-normative) or not? (Thursday, 21 February)
• RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Thursday, 21 February)
• RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Wednesday, 20 February)
• RE: [Bug 5408] Section 8.1.3 sml:nilref is non-normative (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: [Bug 5402] Remove text concerning references "expressed in multiple ways" (Monday, 4 February)
• RE: [Bug 5398] SMLIF 5.2 clarifications (Monday, 4 February)
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-23 SML F2F in Orlando (Friday, 1 February)

Valentina Popescu

• Feb 14 meeting minutes (Wednesday, 20 February)
• regrets for today's meeting (Thursday, 7 February)

Wilson, Kirk D

• Potential discussion topic (Thursday, 21 February)
• RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Wednesday, 20 February)
• RE: [Bug 5496] Definition of Interchange Set (Wednesday, 20 February)
• RE: [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-23 SML F2F in Orlando (Monday, 4 February)

zamp\@libero\.it

• xlink vs sml:URI (Wednesday, 27 February)
• xlink vs sml:URI (Wednesday, 27 February)
• sml:ref vs xlink (Wednesday, 27 February)

Zulah Eckert

• Regrets for today (Thursday, 7 February)

Last message date: Friday, 29 February 2008 17:57:33 UTC