- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:41:00 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5181 ------- Comment #21 from kirk.wilson@ca.com 2008-02-16 14:41 ------- In general +1 for the changes, with the following notes (based on the Word doc diff version comment #14): 1. There needs to be a global change from "/model/identify" to "/model/identity". 2. In section 5.3.2, "{aliases}" is defined as a set of absolute URIs but primaryAliases can be relative references. Isn't this an inconsistency? 3. Numbered items 3 & 4 in 5.3.2.1 seem poorly expressed: 3. When relative URI references subject to SML-IF URI processing exists in the interchange set and all have different base URI values [if "all" refers to each, why can't two references share the same base URI value?], the document level is the suggested alternative. 4. When relative URI references subject to SML-IF URI processing exist in the interchange set and they use a mixture of base URI values, some the same and some different, both levels may be used. [I would suggest removing the phras "some the same and some different"] SUGGESTED REVISION 3. When relative URI references subject to SML-IF URI processing exists in the interchange set and each document has its own base URI value, the document level is the suggested alternative. 4. When relative URI references subject to SML-IF URI processing exist in the interchange set and they use a mixture of base URI values with some documents sharing the same value, both levels may be used.
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2008 14:41:06 UTC