- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:11:34 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5496 ------- Comment #2 from virginia.smith@hp.com 2008-02-20 18:11 ------- Section 5.2 states that "The definition and instance documents packaged by an SML-IF document MAY form a valid SML model but it is not required to do so." In addition, we have no concept of a 'complete' model. I think we can still call the content of an SML-IF exchange an 'SML model' - it may not be valid or (complete from the consumer's point of view) but it can still be called an SML model. The definition of interchange set already has a link to the SML spec which defines 'model' and also defines conformance criteria for an SML model. We could make a statement that the SML model contained in the interchange set must form a 'conforming SML model'. We have not stated that as a requirement in the IF spec.
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:11:44 UTC