public-rdf-star@w3.org from October 2020 by thread

Do we need referential opacity? Pierre-Antoine Champin (Thursday, 29 October)

weakness of embedded triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 14 October)

• Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Wednesday, 14 October)
  • Re: weakness of embedded triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: weakness of embedded triples Doerthe Arndt (Wednesday, 14 October)
  • Re: weakness of embedded triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 14 October)
    • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Thursday, 15 October)
      • Re: weakness of embedded triples Martynas Jusevičius (Saturday, 17 October)
        • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Monday, 19 October)
        • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pavel Klinov (Monday, 19 October)
          • Re: weakness of embedded triples Holger Knublauch (Monday, 19 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Monday, 19 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pavel Klinov (Monday, 19 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Martynas Jusevičius (Monday, 19 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Holger Knublauch (Monday, 19 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples james anderson (Tuesday, 20 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Wednesday, 21 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples thomas lörtsch (Wednesday, 21 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Wednesday, 21 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 21 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples thomas lörtsch (Wednesday, 21 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples thomas lörtsch (Wednesday, 21 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Thursday, 22 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 22 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Friday, 23 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples james anderson (Friday, 23 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Holger Knublauch (Saturday, 24 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Tuesday, 27 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 27 October)
            • Can RDF* be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Pierre-Antoine Champin (Wednesday, 28 October)
            • Re: Can RDF* be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Olaf Hartig (Wednesday, 28 October)
            • Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Jerven Bolleman (Wednesday, 28 October)
            • Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Pierre-Antoine Champin (Wednesday, 28 October)
            • owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Jerven Tjalling Bolleman (Wednesday, 28 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Pierre-Antoine Champin (Wednesday, 28 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) thomas lörtsch (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Pierre-Antoine Champin (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) thomas lörtsch (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Pierre-Antoine Champin (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Kingsley Idehen (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) David Booth (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) thomas lörtsch (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Holger Knublauch (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Kingsley Idehen (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Holger Knublauch (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Kingsley Idehen (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Holger Knublauch (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Kingsley Idehen (Friday, 30 October)
            • Twice married to the same person problem, was [Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity] Jerven Tjalling Bolleman (Friday, 30 October)
            • RE: Twice married to the same person problem, was [Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity] Storm, Jonathon (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Pierre-Antoine Champin (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) thomas lörtsch (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) David Booth (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 30 October)
            • Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) David Booth (Saturday, 31 October)
            • Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Pierre-Antoine Champin (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples) Pierre-Antoine Champin (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pavel Klinov (Saturday, 24 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Tuesday, 27 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 27 October)
            • Are the names RDF* and SPARQL* worth the confusion? Kingsley Idehen (Tuesday, 27 October)
            • Re: Are the names RDF* and SPARQL* worth the confusion? Ted Thibodeau Jr (Wednesday, 28 October)
            • Re: Are the names RDF* and SPARQL* worth the confusion? David Booth (Thursday, 29 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Pierre-Antoine Champin (Tuesday, 27 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 28 October)
            • Re: weakness of embedded triples Holger Knublauch (Monday, 19 October)

use cases for RDF* Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 14 October)

• Re: use cases for RDF* Kingsley Idehen (Wednesday, 14 October)
  • Re: use cases for RDF* David Booth (Wednesday, 14 October)

how many RDF* triples? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 14 October)

• Re: how many RDF* triples? Olaf Hartig (Wednesday, 14 October)
  • Re: how many RDF* triples? Patrick J Hayes (Wednesday, 14 October)
    • Re: how many RDF* triples? Olaf Hartig (Thursday, 15 October)
      • Re: how many RDF* triples? Pierre-Antoine Champin (Thursday, 15 October)
        • Re: how many RDF* triples? Jos De Roo (Thursday, 15 October)
          • Re: how many RDF* triples? Pierre-Antoine Champin (Thursday, 15 October)
            • Re: how many RDF* triples? Olaf Hartig (Thursday, 15 October)
            • Re: how many RDF* triples? Jos De Roo (Thursday, 15 October)
            • Re: how many RDF* triples? Olaf Hartig (Thursday, 15 October)
            • Re: how many RDF* triples? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 15 October)

Moving RDF* forward Pierre-Antoine Champin (Tuesday, 13 October)

• Re: Moving RDF* forward Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 13 October)
  • Re: Moving RDF* forward Jeen Broekstra (Tuesday, 13 October)
    • Re: Moving RDF* forward Olaf Hartig (Wednesday, 14 October)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 October 2020 02:30:34 UTC