public-rdf-star@w3.org from October 2020 by subject

Are the names RDF* and SPARQL* worth the confusion?

Can RDF* be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)

Do we need referential opacity?

how many RDF* triples?

Moving RDF* forward

owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)

Twice married to the same person problem, was [Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity]

use cases for RDF*

weakness of embedded triples

Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 October 2020 02:30:34 UTC