- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:19:02 +1000
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
I have just raised a GitHub issue to discuss details of the mapping
between triples and URIs:
https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/23
Holger
On 10/30/2020 9:54 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
> On 10/30/2020 8:25 AM, thomas lörtsch wrote:
>> But introducing a new node type to me feels like a much graver
>> intervention into the RDF semantics than defining a mapping from
>> statements to IRIs.
>
> Yes exactly. We are all thinking out loud here and the outcome is
> likely going to be some glued-on patch that isn't going to be perfect
> from a theoretical POV. But the fact that RDF is already widely used
> and implemented is an opportunity, not a problem. Therefore, I think
> the minor issue with the potential leakage when triple IRIs with blank
> nodes get written to Turtle is perfectly acceptable and pragmatic. A
> simple solution would be that the applications throw an error or a
> warning if they encounter such triples, so going from TTL* to TTL will
> simply not happen in practice.
>
> Holger
>
>
Received on Friday, 30 October 2020 00:19:18 UTC