- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:19:02 +1000
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
I have just raised a GitHub issue to discuss details of the mapping between triples and URIs: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/23 Holger On 10/30/2020 9:54 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > > On 10/30/2020 8:25 AM, thomas lörtsch wrote: >> But introducing a new node type to me feels like a much graver >> intervention into the RDF semantics than defining a mapping from >> statements to IRIs. > > Yes exactly. We are all thinking out loud here and the outcome is > likely going to be some glued-on patch that isn't going to be perfect > from a theoretical POV. But the fact that RDF is already widely used > and implemented is an opportunity, not a problem. Therefore, I think > the minor issue with the potential leakage when triple IRIs with blank > nodes get written to Turtle is perfectly acceptable and pragmatic. A > simple solution would be that the applications throw an error or a > warning if they encounter such triples, so going from TTL* to TTL will > simply not happen in practice. > > Holger > >
Received on Friday, 30 October 2020 00:19:18 UTC