- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:05:04 -0400
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
- Cc: Johannes Frey <frey@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Kay Mueller <kay.mueller@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Erhard Rahm <rahm@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Maria-Esther Vidal <Maria.Vidal@tib.eu>
On 10/14/20 12:02 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > I've stumbled across a nice paper that covers a variety of RDF store > approaches without introducing any of this RDF* and SPARQL* confusion [1]. > > Links: > > [1] http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/system/files/swj1791.pdf -- > Evaluation of Metadata Representations in > RDF stores That's a nice comparison of approaches! Thanks for bringing that paper to our attention! Two other thoughts come to mind: - Standardization of n-ary relations could also help address this problem, because it would allow tools to automatically recognize and better support them, such as with convenient syntactic sugar. - Automatic transparent conversion between different representations could also help, so that a representation that is most convenient in one context could be viewed and used differently in another context. However, these topics may be better suited to some other forum, since they are much broader than RDF*. David Booth
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2020 17:05:19 UTC