- From: Olaf Hartig <olaf.hartig@liu.se>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:46:03 +0200
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
- Cc: Jeen Broekstra <jb@metaphacts.com>
Thanks Jeen. Good point! I have added placeholders for sections about SPARQL* query result formats to the draft. https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/#query-result-formats Additionally, I realized that we forgot to have a section about SPARQL* Update. I have added a placeholder for such a section as well. -Olaf On onsdag 14 oktober 2020 kl. 09:45:54 CEST Jeen Broekstra wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020, at 09:33, Holger Knublauch wrote: > > On 10/14/2020 2:45 AM, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > > Hi all, > > RDF* is gaining traction, with more and more implementations; but to avoid > fragmentation, we need to build a consensus and a stable specification for > it. > > To achieve this goal, Olaf and I have started drafting a Community Group > report, which is available here: > > https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/ > > Great! Thanks for starting this. > > > +1. Thanks for getting us into gear :) > > Please note that: > > * the actual dates are not relevant, only the day-of-week and timeslots (I > chose dates after Europe and US switch to DST, to see how the timeslots > align in the longer term, but we can start earlier if needed); > > * the timeslots are within working(ish) hours for both Europe and US, as it > seems that most people on the mailing list are in these regions; sincere > apologies for the others -- if you really want to participate but can not > join on any of the proposed slot, let us know. > > Yeah, the bane of living in Australia is that such meetings are often > impossible to attend. None of the times work for me but I will try to > contribute in written form, esp working towards > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/9 which we consider critical before > we can fully migrate from our home-grown reification solution to RDF*. > > > Another +1 (another Aussie resident here). > > Like Holger, I'll focus on contributing asynchronously. My current focus is > on query result syntax format standardization (I've opened 2 issues for > this, see https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/12 > <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/13> and > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/13), which I'd be happy to try and > write some draft specs for as well. As far as I'm aware there is little > real controversy on the topic, just a need to come up with a single variant > that gets a "community stamp". > > Cheers, > > Jeen
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2020 06:48:25 UTC