Saturday, 31 October 2020
Friday, 30 October 2020
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- RE: Twice married to the same person problem, was [Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity]
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Twice married to the same person problem, was [Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity]
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
Thursday, 29 October 2020
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Do we need referential opacity?
- Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: Are the names RDF* and SPARQL* worth the confusion?
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
Wednesday, 28 October 2020
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: Are the names RDF* and SPARQL* worth the confusion?
- Yes it can and should ;) Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: Can RDF* be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Can RDF* be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
Tuesday, 27 October 2020
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Are the names RDF* and SPARQL* worth the confusion?
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
Saturday, 24 October 2020
Friday, 23 October 2020
Thursday, 22 October 2020
Wednesday, 21 October 2020
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
Tuesday, 20 October 2020
Monday, 19 October 2020
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
Saturday, 17 October 2020
Thursday, 15 October 2020
- Re: how many RDF* triples?
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: how many RDF* triples?
- Re: how many RDF* triples?
- Re: how many RDF* triples?
- Re: how many RDF* triples?
- Re: how many RDF* triples?
- Re: how many RDF* triples?
- Re: how many RDF* triples?
Wednesday, 14 October 2020
- Re: how many RDF* triples?
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: weakness of embedded triples
- Re: use cases for RDF*
- weakness of embedded triples
- Re: use cases for RDF*
- use cases for RDF*
- Re: how many RDF* triples?
- how many RDF* triples?
- Re: Moving RDF* forward