public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from October 2005 by date

Friday, 28 October 2005

• Re: SPARQL Query Language Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on SPARQL: Querying the Dataset Dan Connolly
• Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: ORDER with IRIs Bjoern Hoehrmann
• SPARQL Query Language Herman ter Horst

Wednesday, 26 October 2005

• Re: Traversing trees with sparql? Danny Ayers
• Namespaces Richard Newman
• Re: Traversing trees with sparql? Richard Newman
• Re: Traversing trees with sparql? Danny Ayers
• Re: Traversing trees with sparql? Richard Newman
• Re: Traversing trees with sparql? Danny Ayers
• Re: SPARQL Protocol comments (editorial) Kendall Clark
• Re: WSDL comments on SPARQL Protocol LC Draft Kendall Clark
• Traversing trees with sparql? Jones, David H
• SPARQL Protocol comments (editorial) Arjohn Kampman
• Comments Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr
• Re: Some typos in WD [closed] Dan Connolly
• [closed]: SPARQL Protocol for RDF Dan Connolly
• [closed]: Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction..." Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL: IRIs vs RDF URI References [closed] Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL variable names syntax [closed] Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 25 October 2005

• WSDL comments on SPARQL Protocol LC Draft Jonathan Marsh
• Re: SPARQL Results Format and Unbound Variables Dan Connolly
• Re: need extar information in SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: need extar information in SPARQL Serkant Karaca
• Re: Query forms should be resources, not operations [OK?] Dan Connolly
• need extar information in SPARQL Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr

Wednesday, 19 October 2005

• Re: [CLOSED] Re: Typo in RDF Dataset definition Jeroen van der Ham

Tuesday, 18 October 2005

• Re: [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS Karl Dubost
• Re: [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS [OK?] Karl Dubost
• Re: [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS [OK?] Karl Dubost
• [CLOSED] Re: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch." Tim Berners-Lee
• [OK?] Re: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch." Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [OK?] Re: SPARQL: ORDER with IRIs Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [OK?] Re: SPARQL: BASE IRI resolution Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 17 October 2005

• RE: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs (decimal syntax) Dan Connolly
• Re: [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS Kendall Clark
• Re: [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS [OK?] Kendall Clark
• Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF Kendall Clark
• Re: SPARQL: IRIs vs RDF URI References [OK?] Seaborne, Andy

Saturday, 15 October 2005

• Broad application of CSS hypertext pseudo-classes (as to SPARQL "link" elements) Etan Wexler

Friday, 14 October 2005

• RE: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs (decimal syntax) Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs (decimal syntax) Michael Kay
• Re: [comments] typo and general (protocol test suite in development) Karl Dubost
• Re: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs (decimal syntax) Dan Connolly
• Re: [comments] typo and general (protocol test suite in development) Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL variable names syntax [OK?] Walid Maalej

Thursday, 13 October 2005

• Re: [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS [OK?] Dan Connolly
• Wrong SOAP namespace Hugo Haas
• Re: SPARQL: IRIs vs RDF URI References [OK?] Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: SPARQL: QuotedIRIref too lax [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL: Backslashes in string literals [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Please make sure the grammar is directly machine consumable. [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL variable names syntax [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL: IRIs vs RDF URI References [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS [OK?] Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 12 October 2005

• Re: [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS [OK?] Dan Connolly
• [comments] typo and general Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 11 October 2005

• [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 12 October 2005

• [comments] Note about WSDL2 Binding Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 11 October 2005

• Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF Dan Connolly
• SPARQL Protocol for RDF Karl Dubost

Friday, 7 October 2005

• Re: Some typos in WD [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Some typos in WD [OK?] Olivier Corby

Thursday, 6 October 2005

• Re: Some typos in WD [OK?] Seaborne, Andy

Wednesday, 5 October 2005

• Re: Query forms should be resources, not operations Dan Connolly
• RE: querying RDF lists [closed] Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL: QuotedIRIref too lax [OK?] Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: SPARQL: QuotedIRIref too lax [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: querying RDF lists Seaborne, Andy
• RE: querying RDF lists [OK?] Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)

Tuesday, 4 October 2005

• Re: querying RDF lists [OK?] Dan Connolly

Monday, 3 October 2005

• querying RDF lists Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)

Last message date: Friday, 28 October 2005 22:51:51 UTC