Re: Traversing trees with sparql?

On 10/26/05, Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk> wrote:
> What SPARQL lacks is any way to say "and keep going" without
> repeatedly (recursively!) asking additional queries.

So what's wrong with:

?x ?y ?z .

?

(answer not required ;-)


--

http://dannyayers.com

Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 22:19:31 UTC