Re: SPARQL: IRIs vs RDF URI References [closed]

On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 17:44 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> 
> Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> > * Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > 
> >>The working group has decided to remove mention of "RDF URI Reference". 
> >>SPARQl is defined in terms of IRIs.
> > 
> > 
> > Looking at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ this sounds good.
> > There is however a strange reference "[3987, sec 3.1]" which should
> > probably be "[RFC3987, section 3.1]" or similar and a link to the entry
> > in the references appendix.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> 
> This is editorial so I have gone ahead and made that suggested change to the 
> editors' working draft, includling a link to the RFC 3987 reference.

I take it this comment is addressed to your satisfaction, Bjoern.
I'm marking the thread closed.

> 	Thanks
> 	Andy
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E