Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF

On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 02:53:53PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 15:12 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote:
> > Hi Kendal,
> > 
> > I'm starting the review of SPARQL do you prefer one mail with all  
> > comments?
> > Or an individual mail by comment?
> I expect the best will be one message for each of your top
> 3 or 4 comments, and then a batch for the rest.
> To the extent that you have independent comments that are
> requests to change the protocol (and not just the description
> of the protocol), please send those in separate messages.
> It's probably easiest to batch up editorial suggestions,
> i.e. change requests that you're happy for the editor
> to do with as he pleases.


I'm happy with Dan's suggestions. Sorry I didn't respond sooner, but I was
on vacation.

Kendall Clark

Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 20:19:49 UTC