On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 02:53:53PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 15:12 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote: > > Hi Kendal, > > > > I'm starting the review of SPARQL do you prefer one mail with all > > comments? > > Or an individual mail by comment? > > I expect the best will be one message for each of your top > 3 or 4 comments, and then a batch for the rest. > > To the extent that you have independent comments that are > requests to change the protocol (and not just the description > of the protocol), please send those in separate messages. > > It's probably easiest to batch up editorial suggestions, > i.e. change requests that you're happy for the editor > to do with as he pleases. Karl, I'm happy with Dan's suggestions. Sorry I didn't respond sooner, but I was on vacation. Cheers, Kendall ClarkReceived on Monday, 17 October 2005 20:19:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:22 UTC