Re: SPARQL: IRIs vs RDF URI References [OK?]

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>The working group has decided to remove mention of "RDF URI Reference". 
>>SPARQl is defined in terms of IRIs.
> Looking at this sounds good.
> There is however a strange reference "[3987, sec 3.1]" which should
> probably be "[RFC3987, section 3.1]" or similar and a link to the entry
> in the references appendix.
> Thanks,

This is editorial so I have gone ahead and made that suggested change to the 
editors' working draft, includling a link to the RFC 3987 reference.


Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 16:50:24 UTC