W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > October 2005

Re: SPARQL: Backslashes in string literals [OK?]

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:43:05 +0100
Message-ID: <434E5659.9040806@hp.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> Dear RDF Data Access Working Group,
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ does not seem
> to define what it means if a string literal includes a backslash though
> that is allowed by the EBNF. Please add normative prose and an example
> defining and demonstrating proper use of backslashes in string literals.
> See also <http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#sec-Escaping>.
> regards,


The working group has agreed the text in sections A.5 and A.6 of the SPARQL 
grammar section A in the editors' working draft [1] in response to your 
comment.  The grammar also includes productions to put such escape sequences 
in strings.

Please let us know whether this response addresses your comment
to your satisfaction.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#grammar
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2005 12:45:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:22 UTC