[closed]: SPARQL Protocol for RDF

I don't think we need to track this thread as its own comment.

On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 16:17 -0400, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 02:53:53PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 15:12 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote:
> > > Hi Kendal,
> > > 
> > > I'm starting the review of SPARQL do you prefer one mail with all  
> > > comments?
> > > Or an individual mail by comment?
> > 
> > I expect the best will be one message for each of your top
> > 3 or 4 comments, and then a batch for the rest.
> > 
> > To the extent that you have independent comments that are
> > requests to change the protocol (and not just the description
> > of the protocol), please send those in separate messages.
> > 
> > It's probably easiest to batch up editorial suggestions,
> > i.e. change requests that you're happy for the editor
> > to do with as he pleases.
> 
> Karl,
> 
> I'm happy with Dan's suggestions. Sorry I didn't respond sooner, but I was
> on vacation.
> 
> Cheers,
> Kendall Clark
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 04:21:56 UTC