public-qt-comments@w3.org from October 2003 by date

Friday, 31 October 2003

• RE: F&O function fn:normalize-unicode Ashok Malhotra
• RE: F&O function fn:normalize-unicode Addison Phillips [wM]
• RE: Behaviour of fn:string on sequences Kay, Michael
• RE: XSL vs. WORD Kay, Michael
• RE: [XSLT2] 20 Serialization, default method Kay, Michael
• [XSLT2] 20 Serialization, default method Oliver Becker
• XSL vs. WORD Du, Cindy
• Re: Behaviour of fn:string on sequences Paul Duffin
• [FS] Non-wellformed XML Schema example, Section 2.3.5 Torsten Grust

Wednesday, 29 October 2003

• Re: string equality Jan Hidders
• RE: string equality Ashok Malhotra
• string equality Jan Hidders
• RE: [F&O] Typo in 5.1 constructor for xs:QName Ashok Malhotra
• [F&O] Typo in 5.1 constructor for xs:QName Sarah Wilkin
• [Data Model] Typo in 4.6 Processing Instructions Sarah Wilkin

Tuesday, 28 October 2003

• F&O function fn:normalize-unicode Ashok Malhotra
• RE: [Use cases] 1.2.4.3 missing comma Kay, Michael
• RE: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName Kay, Michael
• Re: [Use cases] 1.2.4.3 missing comma Sarah Wilkin
• Re: [Use cases] 1.2.4.3 missing comma (and more...) Jonathan Robie
• Re: [Use cases] 1.2.4.3 missing comma Jonathan Robie
• Re: broken use-case 1.1.9.4 Q4 ? Jonathan Robie
• Re: [Use Cases] Inconsistent anchor for "strong" Jonathan Robie
• Re: [Use cases] More issues Jonathan Robie
• Re: [Use cases] More issues Jonathan Robie
• Re: [Use cases] Jonathan Robie
• RE: Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema Paul Cotton
• Re: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName james anderson

Monday, 27 October 2003

• RE: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName Kay, Michael
• Re: Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
• Re: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName james anderson
• Re: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName james anderson
• Re: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName james anderson
• RE: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName Kay, Michael
• RE: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName Kay, Michael
• RE: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName Kay, Michael
• F&O function fn:escape-uri Ashok Malhotra
• Re: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName james anderson
• Re: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName james anderson
• Re: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName james anderson
• RE: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName Kay, Michael
• RE: WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName Kay, Michael

Sunday, 26 October 2003

• WD-xpath-functions-20030502: casting xs:QName james anderson

Friday, 24 October 2003

• Re: Charter and Activity Statement Liam Quin
• RE: Behaviour of fn:string on sequences Kay, Michael
• Re: Behaviour of fn:string on sequences Paul Duffin

Thursday, 23 October 2003

• RE: Behaviour of fn:string on sequences Kay, Michael
• Re: Behaviour of fn:string on sequences Paul Duffin
• RE: Behaviour of fn:string on sequences Kay, Michael
• Behaviour of fn:string on sequences Paul Duffin

Wednesday, 22 October 2003

• RE: Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema Michael Rys
• Re: Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
• RE: Editorial: Code point, codepoint, or code-point? Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Editorial: Code point, codepoint, or code-point? Michael Brundage

Tuesday, 21 October 2003

• RE: Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema Michael Rys
• Re: Bug in syntax for HexDigits scott_boag@us.ibm.com
• RE: Editorial: Code point, codepoint, or code-point? Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
• RE: Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema Kay, Michael
• Re: Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema Jonathan Robie
• Partial type-assignment and ambiguous RELAX NG schema MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
• Editorial: Code point, codepoint, or code-point? Michael Brundage

Monday, 20 October 2003

• RE: Unicode references Martin Duerst
• RE: Unicode references Ashok Malhotra

Sunday, 19 October 2003

• Re: Unicode references Martin Duerst

Saturday, 18 October 2003

• RE: XQuery Michael Rys

Friday, 17 October 2003

• Re: Unicode references Martin Duerst
• Re: XQuery and GET Jonathan Robie
• Bug in syntax for HexDigits Norman H Cohen
• Re: XQuery and GET Mark Baker
• Re: Missing functions in XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and O perators Liam Quin
• These aren't official responses Jonathan Robie
• Thanks for reporting Use Case Bugs Jonathan Robie
• RE: XQuery Paul Cotton
• Re: XQuery and GET Jonathan Robie
• RE: XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Unicode references Ashok Malhotra
• Re: XQuery Guido Moerkotte
• Re: XQuery Liam Quin
• RE: Unicode references Kay, Michael
• RE: XQuery Kay, Michael
• Re: XQuery Bill Keese
• RE: XQuery Michael Rys
• Re: XQuery Bill Keese

Thursday, 16 October 2003

• RE: Unicode references Michael Rys
• Re: Unicode references Martin Duerst
• Re: Missing functions in XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and O perators Erik Bruchez
• RE: XQuery and GET Michael Rys
• Re: XQuery Dimitre Novatchev
• Re: XQuery Dimitre Novatchev
• Re: XQuery Liam Quin
• Re: XQuery and GET Mark Baker
• RE: XQuery and GET Michael Rys
• RE: XQuery Michael Rys
• RE: XQuery Michael Brundage
• RE: XQuery Michael Rys
• Re: [Use cases] 1.2.4.3 missing comma (and more...) Sarah Wilkin
• Unicode references Ashok Malhotra
• Use of Collations in the F&O Document Ashok Malhotra
• RE: XQuery Kay, Michael
• Re: XQuery Guido Moerkotte
• RE: XQuery Michael Brundage
• RE: XQuery Kay, Michael
• XQuery and GET Mark Baker

Wednesday, 15 October 2003

• Re: [Use cases] 1.2.4.3 missing comma Sarah Wilkin
• [Use cases] 1.2.4.3 missing comma Sarah Wilkin
• Re: broken use-case 1.1.9.4 Q4 ? Xavier Franc
• Re: broken use-case 1.1.9.4 Q4 ? Sarah Wilkin
• RE: XQuery Michael Rys
• RE: XQuery Michael Brundage
• RE: XPath/Xquery Operations And Function Specification: Ashok Malhotra
• RE: XQuery Kay, Michael
• Re: XQuery Guido Moerkotte
• Re: Missing functions in XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and O perators Liam Quin

Tuesday, 14 October 2003

• Re: Missing functions in XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and O perators Erik Bruchez
• [Use Cases] Inconsistent anchor for "strong" Sarah Wilkin
• RE: Missing functions in XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and O perators Michael Rys
• Re: Missing functions in XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and O perators Erik Bruchez
• RE: ORA-FO-REPLACE-EMPTY 7.5.3 fn:replace Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Missing functions in XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and O perators Kay, Michael
• RE: [F&O] Function for self-evaluation? Kay, Michael
• RE: XQuery Kay, Michael
• XQuery Guido Moerkotte
• RE: [F&O] Function for self-evaluation? Michael Rys
• RE: [F&O] Function for self-evaluation? Michael Brundage
• RE: [F&O] Function for self-evaluation? Michael Rys

Monday, 13 October 2003

• [F&O] Function for self-evaluation? Sarah Wilkin
• Missing functions in XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Erik Bruchez

Sunday, 12 October 2003

• RE: another issue with min/max functions Ashok Malhotra

Saturday, 11 October 2003

• another issue with min/max functions Xavier Franc
• Re: [Use cases] More issues Xavier Franc
• RE: DN-FO-18: Empty sequence should not be allowed as argument to max(), min(), and avg() Dimitre Novatchev
• RE: DN-FO-18: Empty sequence should not be allowed as argument to max(), min(), and avg() Kay, Michael
• DN-FO-18: Empty sequence should not be allowed as argument to max(), min(), and avg() Dimitre Novatchev
• Re: [Use cases] More issues Dimitre Novatchev

Friday, 10 October 2003

• [Use cases] More issues Alberto Massari
• RE: MS-FO-LC1-009: TZ preservation considered problematic Ashok Malhotra

Thursday, 9 October 2003

• Re: [XQuery] Editorial points for grammar for XQuery (August 22, 2003) scott_boag@us.ibm.com
• RE: [F&O] 17.8 Two definitions for decimal -> double Ashok Malhotra
• RE: [F&O] 17.8 Two definitions for decimal -> double Kay, Michael
• Re: F&O: parameter occurrences Ashok Malhotra

Wednesday, 8 October 2003

• RE: XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators Kay, Michael
• RE: XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators Kay, Michael
• [XQuery] Editorial points for grammar for XQuery (August 22, 2003) Alberto Massari
• [F&O] 17.10 Inconsistencies (casting to dates and times) Sarah Wilkin
• [Use cases] Alberto Massari
• Re: XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators Xan Gregg
• Re: MS-FO-LC1-037: String functions should treat () as Ashok Malhotra
• RE: ORA-FO-EMPTY-RETURN 2.3 fn:string Ashok Malhotra

Tuesday, 7 October 2003

• RE: [F&O] 17.8 Two definitions for decimal -> double Ashok Malhotra
• [F&O] 17.8 Two definitions for decimal -> double Sarah Wilkin
• RE: XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators Ashok Malhotra
• Re: XSLT 2.0 xsl:output attributes should be dynamically configurable Bob Foster
• XSLT 2.0 xsl:output attributes should be dynamically configurable Bob Foster
• RE: DN-FO-08: 15.1.10 fn:distinct-nodes Ashok Malhotra

Monday, 6 October 2003

• Re: KindTest for namespaces Sarah Wilkin
• RE: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (first part) [54] Ashok Malhotra
• RE: XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators Ashok Malhotra
• RE: KindTest for namespaces Kay, Michael
• RE: KindTest for namespaces Kay, Michael
• Re: KindTest for namespaces Sarah Wilkin
• RE: KindTest for namespaces Michael Rys
• KindTest for namespaces Sarah Wilkin
• RE: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (first part) [30] Ashok Malhotra
• RE: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (first part) [23] Ashok Malhotra
• RE: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (first part) [21] Ashok Malhotra
• Re: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (2nd part) [121] Ashok Malhotra
• RE: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (first part) Ashok Malhotra
• RE: MS-FO-LC1-047: 7.5.2 fn:matches Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Timezones in get-hours-from-dateTime etc. Kay, Michael

Sunday, 5 October 2003

• Functions on Dates, Times and Durations Ashok Malhotra
• RE: MS-FO-LC1-001: Notation for special static return types Ashok Malhotra

Saturday, 4 October 2003

• RE: Timezones in get-hours-from-dateTime etc. Xavier Franc

Friday, 3 October 2003

• RE: Re: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (2nd part) [83] Francois Yergeau
• RE: URI for Unicode collation algorithm Michael Rys
• RE: URI for Unicode collation algorithm Ashok Malhotra
• Re: URI for Unicode collation algorithm Martin Duerst
• URI for Unicode collation algorithm Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Timezones in get-hours-from-dateTime etc. Kay, Michael
• RE: Re: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (2nd part) [83] Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Re: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (2nd part) [95] Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Re: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (2nd part) [105] Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Timezones in get-hours-from-dateTime etc. Xavier Franc
• Re: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (2nd part) [111] Ashok Malhotra
• RE: [F&O] avg() Ashok Malhotra
• [XPath2] 3.5 Comparison Expressions: Node and Order Oliver Becker
• [XPath2] Examples in 3.3.2 Combining Sequences Oliver Becker

Thursday, 2 October 2003

• RE: Re: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Functions and Operators 2nd part [147] Ashok Malhotra
• Re: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (2nd part) Ashok Malhotra
• Re: ComputedXmlComment (3.7.3.6) shouldn't require content Sarah Wilkin
• RE: ComputedXmlComment (3.7.3.6) shouldn't require content Kay, Michael
• ComputedXmlComment (3.7.3.6) shouldn't require content Sarah Wilkin
• RE: DNXSLT01: XSLT 2.0 10.3.1 -- Reserved namespace declaration m issing in examples Kay, Michael
• RE: SAG-FO-01: Too many functions (general comment) Ashok Malhotra
• RE: SAG-FO-05: aggregate functions Ashok Malhotra
• DNXSLT01: XSLT 2.0 10.3.1 -- Reserved namespace declaration missing in examples Dimitre Novatchev
• Timezones in get-hours-from-dateTime etc. Kay, Michael
• RE: un-parsed....function limitation... Kay, Michael

Wednesday, 1 October 2003

• un-parsed....function limitation... Rajasekhar Cherukuri
• RE: F&O collation arguments Ashok Malhotra

Last message date: Friday, 31 October 2003 17:04:58 UTC