- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 11:24:33 -0400
- To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashokma@microsoft.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM>
Hello Ashok, To the best of my knowledge, there is currently no predefined URI identifying the Unicode collation algorithm. There is of course an URI for the spec, http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/ for the newest version, and http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/tr10-9.html for the current version. Ideally, such an URI would come from Chris Newman's work. So for the moment, just using a placeholder should be fine. You may have to make up (or nail down) an URI for the algorithm at a later stage, if necessary. Regards, Martin. At 07:08 03/10/03 -0700, Ashok Malhotra wrote: >Your comment [40] below says " But there should at the minimum also be a >predefined anyURI for identifying the Unicode collation algorithm >(without any special tailoring). > >We would be happy to add such an anyURI. Could you tell us what it is >or where to find it? Many thanks! > >All the best, Ashok > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments- > > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Duerst > > Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 2:06 PM > > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > > Cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org > > Subject: I18N last call comments on XQuery/XPath Fun/Op (first part) > > > > > > Dear XML Query WG and XSL WG, > > > > Below please find the I18N WGs comments on your last call document > > "XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators" > > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xpath-functions-20030502/). > > [40] *** 7.3: Having an anyURI to identify a collation by codepoint >order > > (http://www.w3.org/2003/05/xpath-functions/collation/codepoint) >is > > good. But there should at the minimum also be a predefined anyURI > > for identifying the Unicode collation algorithm (without any >special > > tailoring). Please note that this not necessarily means that > > implementations > > have to support this algorithm (which we definitely would not >object > > to), > > but it at least means that different implementations that all > > implement > > that algorithm can interoperate. > >
Received on Friday, 3 October 2003 14:10:00 UTC