- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 23:05:39 +0100
- To: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Cc: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 17:06:21 UTC
> Might a reasonable implementor expect that "expanded > QName" would be deprecated in favor of "expanded name". is there any > reason to not do that now? > I agree that we should make an effort to agree with the Namespaces 1.1 spec on calling it either an "expanded name" or an "expanded QName". We should perhaps throw "namespace name" vs "namespace URI" into the melting pot at the same time. Paul, perhaps this could be a coordination item for Cannes. Michael Kay
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 17:06:21 UTC