- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 19:05:37 -0400
- To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashokma@microsoft.com>, <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, <w3c-xml-query-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Hello Ashok, Below, you write: "There was a feeling that Unicode was too new and as yet not widely implemented." I very much hope you and your WGs didn't really mean that. Can you please clarify? Regards, Martin. At 08:28 03/10/16 -0700, Ashok Malhotra wrote: >In their review of the F&O document the I18N WG asked that the references >to Unicode be changed to Unicode 4.0.and to change the reference to case >mapping to Annexure #15 of Unicode 4.0 and the normalization forms defined >in Unicode 4.0. See <file://Also >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jul/0105.html>Al >so >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jul/0105.html >and ><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jul/0106.html>h >ttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jul/0106.html > >The XML Schema WG asked that the references to Unicode be consistent. See ><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Aug/0003.html>h >ttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Aug/0003.html > >This was discussed in the joint WG meeting in Toronto. There was a >feeling that Unicode was too new and as yet not widely implemented. There >was also the argument for consistency. Thus, it was decided that the F&O >would refer to the XML standard, since that is what the spec is based on, >and be consistent with it. > >All the best, Ashok
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2003 19:49:50 UTC