- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:04:55 +0200
- To: Sarah Wilkin <swilkin@apple.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:05:12 UTC
Surely the only reason for using a computed comment constructor is that you want to compute the content? And anyway, you can always write: comment {""} Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: Sarah Wilkin [mailto:swilkin@apple.com] > Sent: 02 October 2003 18:31 > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: ComputedXmlComment (3.7.3.6) shouldn't require content > > > > It seems at odds that an inline comment does not require > content: XmlComment ::= "<!--" Char* "-->" > > and yet a constructed one does: > ComputedXmlComment ::= "comment" "{" Expr "}" > > It would make more sense as: > ComputedXmlComment ::= "comment" "{" Expr? "}" >
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:05:12 UTC