- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:04:55 +0200
- To: Sarah Wilkin <swilkin@apple.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:05:12 UTC
Surely the only reason for using a computed comment constructor is that you
want to compute the content?
And anyway, you can always write:
comment {""}
Michael Kay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sarah Wilkin [mailto:swilkin@apple.com]
> Sent: 02 October 2003 18:31
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: ComputedXmlComment (3.7.3.6) shouldn't require content
>
>
>
> It seems at odds that an inline comment does not require
> content: XmlComment ::= "<!--" Char* "-->"
>
> and yet a constructed one does:
> ComputedXmlComment ::= "comment" "{" Expr "}"
>
> It would make more sense as:
> ComputedXmlComment ::= "comment" "{" Expr? "}"
>
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:05:12 UTC