- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 22:21:55 -0500
- To: Alberto Massari <amassari@progress.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
At 11:29 AM 10/8/2003, Alberto Massari wrote:
>- the XMP Q11 use case uses the function "deep-equal", but the comment at
>the end of the case has a paragraph on "sequence-deep-equal"
Thanks - deep-equal() now compares sequences, so the paragraph now refers
to deep-equal() instead.
>- The R use case has the comment "The following results assume that the
>queries were executed on Jan. 1, 2000." that is wrong, as it gets denied
>by a following note
Right. I deleted that sentence.
>- the last version of the solution for the SEQ Q5 use case has a user
>function "between"
>
>declare function local:between($seq as node()*, $start as node(), $end as
>node())
> as item()*
>{
> let $nodes :=
> for $n in $seq except $start//node()
> where $n >> $start and $n << $e
> return $n
> return $nodes except $nodes//node()
>};
>
>but the $e variable used in the body doesn't exist: it should be $end
Thanks. Fixed.
>- the NS Q4 use case has an extra ">" in the body
>
><Q4 xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">>
Thanks. Fixed.
Jonathan
Received on Monday, 27 October 2003 22:29:25 UTC