Friday, 29 September 2017
- Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example
- [poe] XML Schema issues
- [poe] Issue: XML Schema issues marked as bug
- [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example
- [poe] Issue: Unsatisfiable consequence example marked as bug
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Thursday, 28 September 2017
- [poe] Harmonize 2.6.7 Remedy property with Prohibition
- [poe] Issue: Harmonize 2.6.7 Remedy property with Prohibition marked as CR review
- Re: [poe] inconsistent requirements wrt. profile definitions
- [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section
- [poe] Issue: Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section marked as Editorial
- [poe] inconsistent requirements wrt. profile definitions
- [poe] Issue: inconsistent requirements wrt. profile definitions marked as CR review
- [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism
- [poe] Issue: fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism marked as Model
Tuesday, 26 September 2017
- Re: [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- Closed: [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- [poe] Conflict - invalid case
- [poe] Issue: Conflict - invalid case marked as Editorial
- Re: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty.
- Re: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty.
- [poe] Issue: the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. marked as CR review
- Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated
- Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated
- [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty.
- Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated
- Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated
- Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated
- Re: [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated
- [poe] Issue: fixing selected examples marked as bug
- [poe] fixing selected examples
Monday, 25 September 2017
- [poe] Issue: Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated marked as Model
- [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Draft announcement texts
- Re: [poe] Draft announcement texts
- [poe] Pull Request: Draft announcement texts
Saturday, 23 September 2017
- Closed: [poe] obligation is missing in odrl.jsonld
- Re: [poe] obligation is missing in odrl.jsonld
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] Issue: obligation is missing in odrl.jsonld marked as JSON-LD
- [poe] obligation is missing in odrl.jsonld
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Friday, 22 September 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
Thursday, 21 September 2017
- Re: [poe] CR IM: JSON of examples 20, 16, 17, 25 wrong
- Closed: [poe] CR IM: JSON of examples 20, 16, 17, 25 wrong
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Wednesday, 20 September 2017
- [poe] CR IM: JSON of example 20 wrong
- [poe] Issue: CR IM: JSON of example 20 wrong marked as Model
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation/Validation issues
- Re: [poe] Problem in JSON-LD?
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation/Validation issues
Tuesday, 19 September 2017
- Re: [poe] Problem in JSON-LD?
- [poe] Issue: Problem in JSON-LD? marked as Validator
- [poe] Problem in JSON-LD?
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation/Validation issues
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation/Validation issues
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Monday, 18 September 2017
- Re: [poe] Note on Policy Inference
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation/Validation issues
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] Pull Request: Updated the CR Transition admin files, publication requests are ready…
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] Issue: ODRL Validation/Validation issues marked as Validator
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] ODRL Validation/Validation issues
Sunday, 17 September 2017
Saturday, 16 September 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Improvement on the /ns content
- Re: [poe] Improvement on the /ns content
- Re: [poe] Improvement on the /ns content
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] Pull Request: Improvement on the /ns content
Friday, 15 September 2017
- Closed: [poe] ODRL Validation questions
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation questions
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation questions
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation questions
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation questions
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation questions
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validation questions
- [poe] ODRL Validation questions
- [poe] Issue: ODRL Validation questions marked as question
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws
- [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Thursday, 14 September 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by simonstey
- [poe] new commits pushed by simonstey
- [poe] new commits pushed by simonstey
- Closed: [poe] IM diagrams issues
- Re: [poe] IM diagrams issues
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by simonstey
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Closed: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Closed: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Closed: [poe] source of a *Collection (and also Asset/Party?)
- Re: [poe] source of a *Collection (and also Asset/Party?)
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] source of a *Collection (and also Asset/Party?)
- Re: [poe] source of a *Collection (and also Asset/Party?)
- Re: [poe] source of a *Collection (and also Asset/Party?)
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- [poe] Issue: source of a *Collection (and also Asset/Party?) marked as Editorial
- [poe] source of a *Collection (and also Asset/Party?)
- [poe] Issue: IM diagrams issues marked as Editorial
- [poe] IM diagrams issues
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
Wednesday, 13 September 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by vroddon
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Closed: [poe] Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand
- Re: [poe] Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- Re: [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- [poe] Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ...
- [poe] Issue: Wording and RDF semantics: Collection - List - Sequence ... marked as Model
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Closed: [poe] Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand
- Re: [poe] Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Tuesday, 12 September 2017
- Re: [poe] Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand
- Re: [poe] Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand
- [poe] Issue: Cardinality of odrl:rightOperand marked as invalid
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation
- Re: [poe] Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation
- Re: [poe] How much infererence for validation?
- Re: [poe] Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Monday, 11 September 2017
- Re: [poe] Move Scenario Examples to Best Practices NOTE
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation
- Re: [poe] Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- Closed: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Closed: [poe] How much infererence for validation?
- Closed: [poe] What exactly is stated by Non-/Active?
- Closed: [poe] Review of Evaluator Truth Tables (of 5 September)
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Closed: [poe] Validation: profiles and new terms
- Closed: [poe] Diagram missing arrows
- Closed: [poe] CR Exit Criteria
- Closed: [poe] Validation: OWL consistency
- Closed: [poe] Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation
- Closed: [poe] Profiles and @context in JSON-LD - 5.2 in Vocab needs update
- Closed: [poe] Wording in Logical Constraints
- Closed: [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- Closed: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- Closed: [poe] Use of plural in the definition of classes and properties in the Vocab
- Closed: [poe] Not-/Active Rules, evaluation, Policy inheritance and conflicts
- Closed: [poe] One redundancy in the spec
- Closed: [poe] Setting a value related to the leftOperand of a constraint
- Closed: [poe] Fixed constraint at policy level
- Closed: [poe] Misleading statements about failure properties
- [poe] Issue: Note on Policy Inference marked as Editorial
- [poe] Issue: Europeana/DPLA use case marked as Editorial
- [poe] Issue: General feedback on POE Use Cases marked as Editorial
- Closed: [poe] Missing type of a Constraint's unit property
- Closed: [poe] rightOperand property: IM and Vocab not in sync
- Re: [poe] Missing type of a Constraint's unit property
- Re: [poe] rightOperand property: IM and Vocab not in sync
- Re: [poe] Review of Evaluator Truth Tables (of 5 September)
- [poe] Review of Evaluator Truth Tables (of 5 September)
Saturday, 9 September 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by vroddon
- Re: [poe] How much infererence for validation?
- Re: [poe] Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Closed: [poe] How to evaluate the results of Permission, Prohibition and Duty
- Closed: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Closed: [poe] How Rules become Active
- Closed: [poe] The foggy effective/in-effect terminology
- Closed: [poe] Which property of type Duty has a consequence property?
- Re: [poe] Profiles and @context in JSON-LD - 5.2 in Vocab needs update
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Friday, 8 September 2017
- [poe] Issue: How much infererence for validation? marked as question
- [poe] How much infererence for validation?
- [poe] Issue: Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation marked as Editorial
- [poe] Mild contradictions in IM wrt validation
- [poe] Issue: Profiles and @context in JSON-LD - 5.2 in Vocab needs update marked as Vocab
- [poe] Profiles and @context in JSON-LD - 5.2 in Vocab needs update
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
Thursday, 7 September 2017
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] Wording in Logical Constraints
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] Issue: Wording in Logical Constraints marked as Model
- Re: [poe] Diagram missing arrows
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Wednesday, 6 September 2017
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] ODRL Validator
- Re: [poe] Diagram missing arrows
- Re: [poe] Diagram missing arrows
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] CR Exit Criteria
- Re: [poe] Diagram missing arrows
- Re: [poe] Diagram missing arrows
- Re: [poe] Diagram missing arrows
- Re: [poe] Validation: profiles and new terms
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Diagram missing arrows
- Re: [poe] Validation: profiles and new terms
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] Diagram missing arrows
- [poe] Issue: Diagram missing arrows marked as Editorial
- Re: [poe] Validation: profiles and new terms
- [poe] Issue: Validation: profiles and new terms marked as Model
- [poe] Validation: profiles and new terms
- Closed: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Validation: OWL consistency
- Re: [poe] Validation: OWL consistency
- Re: [poe] Validation: OWL consistency
- Re: [poe] Validation: OWL consistency
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] CR Exit Criteria
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Tuesday, 5 September 2017
- [poe] Issue: Validation: OWL consistency marked as Model
- [poe] Validation: OWL consistency
- [poe] Issue: Small ammendment: Offer is normative marked as Ontology
- Closed: [poe] Small ammendment: Offer is normative
- Re: [poe] Small ammendment: Offer is normative
- [poe] new commits pushed by vroddon
- [poe] Small ammendment: Offer is normative
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] Issue: What exactly is stated by Non-/Active? marked as Needs WG Decision
- [poe] What exactly is stated by Non-/Active?
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- [poe] Issue: adding disclaimer to http://www.w3.org/TR/odrl marked as Needs Attention
- Re: [poe] adding disclaimer to http://www.w3.org/TR/odrl
- Re: [poe] Modified the config files as a preparation to CR
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- [poe] Issue: CR Exit Criteria marked as Vocab
- [poe] CR Exit Criteria
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Monday, 4 September 2017
- Re: [poe] Modified the config files as a preparation to CR
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] adding disclaimer to http://www.w3.org/TR/odrl
- [poe] Pull Request: Modified the config files as a preparation to CR
- [poe] Pull Request: Modified the config files as a preparation to CR
- Re: [poe] adding disclaimer to http://www.w3.org/TR/odrl
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] ODRL Evaluator
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] use of @value for action constraints
- Re: [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- Re: [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- [poe] Issue: use of @value for refinement constraints marked as invalid
- [poe] use of @value for refinement constraints
- Re: [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- Re: [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Sunday, 3 September 2017
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- Re: [poe] Confusing wording
- Closed: [poe] Confusing wording
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Not-/Active Rules, evaluation, Policy inheritance and conflicts
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Confusing wording
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Saturday, 2 September 2017
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- [poe] new commits pushed by vroddon
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- Re: [poe] Confusing wording
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- Re: [poe] Confusing wording
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] One redundancy in the spec
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] Not-/Active Rules, evaluation, Policy inheritance and conflicts
- [poe] Issue: Not-/Active Rules, evaluation, Policy inheritance and conflicts marked as Model
- Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- [poe] Issue: Confusing wording marked as Model
- [poe] Issue: Assigner/Assignee at the policy level marked as Ontology
- [poe] new commits pushed by vroddon
- [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level
- Closed: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
Friday, 1 September 2017
- Re: [poe] rightOperand property: IM and Vocab not in sync
- [poe] Issue: Validator/validation/valid-related terminology marked as Editorial
- Re: [poe] Confusing wording
- [poe] Confusing wording
- [poe] Validator/validation/valid-related terminology
- Closed: [poe] Logic
- [poe] Logic
- [poe] Issue: One redundancy in the spec marked as question
- [poe] One redundancy in the spec
- Re: [poe] Update contact in w3c.json
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] Pull Request: Update contact in w3c.json
- Re: [poe] Use of plural in the definition of classes and properties in the Vocab
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] rightOperand property: IM and Vocab not in sync
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Missing type of a Constraint's unit property
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Misleading statements about failure properties
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Setting a value related to the leftOperand of a constraint
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by iherman
- [poe] Pull Request: CR admin
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] Use of plurals in the definition of classes and properties in the Vocab
- [poe] Issue: Use of plurals in the definition of classes and properties in the Vocab marked as Editorial
- [poe] Issue: rightOperand property: IM and Vocab not in sync marked as Vocab
- [poe] rightOperand property: IM and Vocab not in sync
- [poe] Issue: Missing type of a Constraint's unit property marked as Model
- [poe] Missing type of a Constraint's unit property
- Re: [poe] Fixed constraint at policy level
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] Misleading statements about failure properties
- [poe] Issue: Misleading statements about failure properties marked as invalid
- [poe] Fixed constraint at policy level
- [poe] Issue: Fixed constraint at policy level marked as Model
- [poe] Issue: Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017 marked as Needs WG Discussion
- [poe] Issue: Setting a value related to the leftOperand of a constraint marked as Model
- Closed: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Closed: [poe] Definition of ODRL
- Closed: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Closed: [poe] ODRL Evaluator review - IM of 11 August 2017