[poe] Issue: General feedback on POE Use Cases marked as Editorial

riannella has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe as "Editorial":

== General feedback on POE Use Cases ==

1. General feedback on POE Use Cases (https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-poe-ucr-20170223/)

Are the requirements identified in this document (https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-poe-ucr-20170223/#Requirements) referred in other POE documents? It would be great to see which requirements have been implemented or not, and by which specific item of the Information Model or Vocabulary. Unless all have been met? It's not very clear. Some requirements have been stricken out, indicating de-prioritization. But it could still be that some of the ones you judge important are only partially met.

Also not all requirements for use cases have been captured. To start with, the RightsStatements.org case could be used to motivate more requirements. In addition to the current focus, rightsstatements.org can articulate other use cases paired with existing requirements, namely:
* POE.R.V.15 - for our statements NoC-CR and NoC-OKLR
* Perhaps new entries under POE.R.E (Encoding) following our use of `relatedURL` parameter for statements that need a link to a human-readable legal piece
* Documenting cases of rights status expiry, which is perhaps relevant to POE.R.DM.06
Would you accept new/revised use cases?

As an other example, I'm not sure POE says anything about propagation of deletions (POE.UC.23). The use case POE.UC.23 had just one general requirement about having complex constraints…

See https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/156

Received on Monday, 11 September 2017 13:41:29 UTC