- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:14:40 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
I suggest to change the definition of the *Collection sub-class of Asset and Party: Asset/PartyCollection - **an Asset/Party that is a single resource representing a set of member resources. This indicates that all the members of the set will ... .** Note: we have to be aware that the two sections about refinement of Asset/PartyCollection use the term "member" heavily. Therefore we must define in the generic definition what a member is and of what it is a member. (And I'm afraid it is too late to rename the partOf property to memberOf.) Another formal issue: * The Asset/Party Class definition defines a partOf property * The Asset/PartyCollection Class is defined as sub-class of the Asset/Party Class and therefore it inherits all properties of the Asset/Party Class, including partOf ... * ... was it planned to have a Asset/PartyCollection instance which is a partOf another Asset/Party Collection instance - and this can be nested indefinitely? * if not: we should define partOf is a property of the Asset/Party Class only and not of any sub-class. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/256#issuecomment-329163794 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 13:14:33 UTC