Re: [poe] Assigner/Assignee at the policy level

I have updated the Policy class section.

I don't think we change the rest of the spec, as we say "It is recommended that compact ODRL Policies be expanded to atomic Policies when being processed for conformance"


> Conclusion from that: if e.g. an assigner is defined at the Policy-level, any Rule MUST NOT have an assigner, that's why PolicyB is invalid.

No, this is not correct. You can have both. The assigner at the Policy-level will be replicated into all the Rules (and join existing assigners)

GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 3 September 2017 12:11:07 UTC