Re: [poe] ODRL Validation/Validation issues

@nitmws Even if the ODRL Validation document was informally written, I have made an effort to be more rigurous and follow your guidelines. In particular:

-  OK to the use of singular and plurals
-  OK to the capitalization of defined terms, except in the titles to gain clarity. In addition fixed-size font has been used to refer to ODRL elements.
-  Types are declared at least after one of the normalization steps. Most of them can be inferred from domain/range by an RDFS reasoner, Set cannot; Collections doubtfully.
- I have improved the titles, I think.
- rdf:DATATYPE and odrl:DELETE are formatted this way by the Wiki system.
- I have implemented the first of the transformations as a SPARQL Update query. However, I cannot do this for the five transformations --especially the Policy Inheritance algorithm, which is relatively complex.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by vroddon
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/261#issuecomment-330371421 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 18 September 2017 22:13:56 UTC