- From: Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 18:36:50 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
vroddon has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe: == Confusing wording == In Section 2.2 of the IM we read: > An Asset must have at least one relation sub-property value (of type Asset) indicating the explicit link relationship to the Asset. And in Section 2.3 we read: > A Party must have at least one function sub-property values (of type Party) indicating the functional role undertaken by the Party. Am I the only one confused after reading this? Wouldn't it be better like this? > **A Rule** must have at least one relation sub-property value (of type Asset) indicating the explicit link relationship to the Asset. > **A Rule** must have at least one function sub-property values (of type Party) indicating the functional role undertaken by the Party. (Bonus comment: what is the meaning of a rule not having a assigner? lacking an assingee is understood as everyone but... lacking an assigner? a work in the public domain? In such a case, please mind that we cannot have zero assigners and zero assignees) Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/238 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 1 September 2017 18:36:51 UTC