Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing

I have removed section 2.6.8 and moved normative statements back into the other sections.

Please review carefully and provide any explicit changes (eg swap "blaa blaa" with "foo foo" in para x of section y)

I have not included any wording that would imply any form of "processing rules".

If there is a need for implementors to describe "states" then the terms in the IM could be used:
Permission: "exercisable" or "not exercisable"
Prohibition: "not-infringed" or "infringed"
Obligation: "fulfilled" or "not-fulfilled"

GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2017 05:49:06 UTC