public-coremob@w3.org from April 2012 by author

andrea.trasatti@nokia.com

• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Friday, 6 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Friday, 6 April)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)

Brian Blakely

• Re: Against touch events... (Monday, 23 April)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source) (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Against touch events... (Monday, 23 April)
• Against touch events... (Monday, 23 April)
• Missing text entry (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source (Friday, 13 April)
• How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Globalisation Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Monday, 9 April)

claudio.riva@nokia.com

• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 5 April)

Cuihtlauac ALVARADO

• Re: [coremob/level-0] df3f70: Replace incorrect use of "MUST [...] if available"... (Wednesday, 18 April)
• Re: [coremob/level-0] df3f70: Replace incorrect use of "MUST [...] if available"... (Tuesday, 17 April)

Emanuele Bolognesi

• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)

Eric Kim

• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Thursday, 29 March)

François Daoust

• Proxy-based Web browsers (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source) (Wednesday, 11 April)

Fritz, Kay, VF-DE

• AW: Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 5 April)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source) (Monday, 30 April)
• Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source) (Tuesday, 17 April)

James Graham

• Re: [coremob/level-0] df3f70: Replace incorrect use of "MUST [...] if available"... (Wednesday, 18 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Saturday, 14 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)

Joe Cincotta

• Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)

Lars Erik Bolstad

• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 11 April)

Mansoor C

• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Monday, 2 April)

Marcos Caceres

• Acknowledging prefixes as not a pass, was Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source) (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source) (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Friday, 13 April)
• Opera mini ain't just for feature phones, was Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Thursday, 12 April)
• Different approach, Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Thursday, 12 April)
• The meat, Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 8 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)

Matt Kelly

• RE: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source) (Monday, 30 April)
• RE: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• RE: Mail List Policy concerning replies (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: Potential mailing list issues [via Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group] (Tuesday, 10 April)
• RE: Mail List Policy concerning replies (Thursday, 5 April)
• RE: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 5 April)
• RE: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• RE: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• RE: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• RE: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Ringmark is now open source (Tuesday, 3 April)

Robin Berjon

• [coremob/level-0] d03107: skeleton draft (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)

Scott Wilson

• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)

Shane McCarron

• Re: Missing text entry (Monday, 23 April)

Stephanie Rieger

• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 5 April)

Thaddee Tyl

• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)

tobie

• [coremob/level-1] (Friday, 27 April)

Tobie Langel

• [coremob/level-1] dc596b: Add View Orientation API section. (Monday, 30 April)
• [coremob/level-1] 45e68a: Add section for Media Capture API. (Monday, 30 April)
• [coremob/level-0] fab900: Fix typos in README file. (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source) (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Missing text entry (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: [coremob/level-0] df3f70: Replace incorrect use of "MUST [...] if available"... (Wednesday, 18 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Monday, 16 April)
• [coremob/level-0] df3f70: Replace incorrect use of "MUST […] if available"... (Friday, 13 April)
• [coremob/level-0] 83c557: Add a sotd section. (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Sunday, 15 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Saturday, 14 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Saturday, 14 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: How many browsers matter Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Potential mailing list issues [via Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group] (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: Mail List Policy concerning replies (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re: Mail List Policy concerning replies (Thursday, 5 April)
• Potential mailing list issues [via Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group] (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Charter amendment proposal (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)
• Re: Rough first draft of Level 0 (Sunday, 1 April)

Wonsuk Lee

• RE: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)
• RE: Ringmark is now open source (Wednesday, 4 April)

Yves Van Goethem

• Mail List Policy concerning replies (Wednesday, 4 April)

Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2012 17:21:46 UTC