- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 16:51:25 +0000
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
On 4/1/12 3:41 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: >The documents says that a UA MUST support: > >"XHTML served as application/xhtml+xml" > >Yes, Opera's MAMA report states that: > >"Of the 3,509,180 URLs that MAMA analyzed, the vast majority (~99.9%) >used a "text/html" MIME type (see full frequency table). "text/plain" and >"application/xhtml+xml" types also had some occasional representation in >the set (~1,000 cases each)." >http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-http-headers/ > >XHTML is statistically insignificant, so why bother mandating its support >as a MUST? > >---- >The document says "Codecs are evil. Thoughts?" > >Codecs are not evil. Codecs that are employed as a tool to degrade >copyright law by misguided patent holders and governments (plus a >severely broken patent system) is what constitutes "evil"Š or better put >"an embarrassment". As Thomas Jefferson put it: > >"Considering the exclusive right to invention as given not of natural >right, but for the benefit of society, I know well the of drawing a line >between the difficulty things which are worth to the public the >embarrassment of an exclusive patent, and those which are not." [1] page >21. > >So, please don't confuse things. Maybe just note that "some codecs are >patent-encumbered and may require prohibitive payment of royalties to >certain parties. Thoughts?". It is within the patent's holders' right to >demand licensing feeds - a necessary and legally valid evil for the life >of the patent. > >---- >The document says: >"User agents must support ECMAScript ed3 [ECMA-262] in full, plus all the >parts from ed5 that can be shimmed, including native JSON." > >This is an aspirational document/wish-list (probably shouldn't even use >RFC2119 language), just say MUST support ECMAScript5. It's not really >different from mandating user agents MUST support specs that are in their >early stages of development, like Selectors API Level 2 (which is a FPWD). Marcos, may I ask you to open up GitHub issues[1] for the above? Or even better, pull requests! Thanks, --tobie [1]: https://github.com/coremob/level-0/issues
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 16:51:57 UTC