RE: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tobie Langel
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 5:37 PM
> To: Henri Sivonen; public-coremob@w3.org; Matt Kelly
> Subject: Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now
> open source)
> 
> >- -
> >A few tangential remarks:
> > * It seems that letting prefixed implementations "pass" continues to
> >ring 1 currently, since prefixed IndexedDB passes there. Letting
> >prefixing continue to new stuff seems to me like Ringmark isn't even
> >trying to put an end to prefixing which one might sort of believe even
> >if transforms, transitions and animations were grandfathered somehow.
> 
> That's an accident. Matt can you fix this?
> 
> > * It seems terrible that the buckets are named "Foo" and "Foo,
> >standard" rather than "Foo, vendor prefixed" and "Foo" if the prefixed
> >buckets are going to stick around.
> 
> Also agree naming is unfortunate. Matt, can we fix?

I'll follow up to the prefix questions shortly.

> 
> > * It's very annoying that the JS at ringmark.io is minified. It's a
> >test suite! You are supposed to be able to easily View Source to see
> >what it does!
> 
> Afaik the unminified src made a significant difference in load time. We
> compromised by pointing to the unminified src from a comment in the HTML.
> 
> > * It seems that an update to code at ringmark.io makes the test suite
> >hang at "CSS 2.1" in Firefox. (I tried the same trunk build yesterday
> >and today. Today, the suite hangs.)
> 
> Matt?

What version?  Desktop or mobile?  Which device?  Can you provide detailed repro information?  I'll take a look.  Thanks

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 18:50:30 UTC