The meat, Re: Ringmark is now open source

On Thursday, 12 April 2012 at 12:58, Robin Berjon wrote:

> I reckon you might come across as more constructive — or for that matter, constructive at all — if you dropped the grandstanding "rich and privileged" grandiloquence. Looking through this entire thread I can't even figure out what it is that you're proposing in concrete terms. Is there any fresh meat beneath the rant? If so let's see it.

So it's clear:  
1. be more inclusive (talk features that are needed, not browsers). I like the lets make the top-100 idea.  
2. Don't make another wish list (or even a spec - just a light document "this is ring mark"). Focus on Ringmark being the next "Acid Test".   
3. If you include "-webkit-", I'll scream bloody murder and throw steaks at you.  


--  
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 22:18:38 UTC