- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:32:50 +0000
- To: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, ext Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
On 4/1/12 4:17 PM, "Arthur Barstow" <Art.Barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >Where is the criteria used to add a feature to the spec? It's right here: http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/wiki/Specs/Coremob_Level_0 >It seems like for this spec to actually be useful, a criterion for adding >a feature to the spec should be a publicly available comprehensive test >suite for the feature. That's a very good point. Testing is at the core of this CG, as expressed in its charter. Facebook is going to be donating a whole bunch of tests which were recently written for Ringmark (http://rng.io). As a side note, I've found it very difficult to have a clear picture of which spec had conformance test suites and what their level of comprehensiveness was. If would be awesome to research and list the level of testing for each feature. --tobie
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 14:33:24 UTC