public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org from February 2007 by author

Eran Chinthaka

• Re: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding (Friday, 16 February)

Jonathan Marsh

• FW: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother (Friday, 23 February)
• FW: InterfaceMessageReference-1205002 (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: InterfaceMessageReference-1205002 (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Clarify 'scope' of {element declarations} and {type definitions} re SparqlQuerySimplified-1G (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: {element declaration} for Interface Fault component (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: {http cookies} REQUIRED? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: rpc:signature question. (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: HTTP Location property definition (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: Tranfer-Encoding vs Content-Encoding (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: SOAP Response and IRI style (Tuesday, 20 February)
• FW: Turning off http transfer coding (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: SOAP Fault code issue (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: LocationTemplate-1G totally hosed ;-) (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: Leftovers of trailing slashes in replacement parameters (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: Proposal for CR108 (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: Interface Inheritance Clarification (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: New interchange results (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: problem with pattern attribute definition? (Friday, 16 February)
• FW: editorial: features and properties in "xml representation" sections (Friday, 16 February)
• FW: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: LocationTemplate-1G totally hosed ;-) (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1 (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: Ignoring uncited and nillable (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: Suggestion on Part - 2 : Adjuncts (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: Spelling mistake in Part 2 (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: {http location} ignored on SOAP request-response MEP? (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: Question on double curly braces with HTTP Location (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: HTTP Method selection (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: Missing attribute in section 6.2 (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the http location (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the http location (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Mapping WSDL MEPs to SOAP MEPs (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: SOAP Response query string issue (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Mapping WSDL meps to the HTTP binding (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Semantics of {http cookies} Property. (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding [Plus two Questions] (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Fault Binding (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Two comments and a question on the WSDL HTTP Binding Extension (Thursday, 15 February)
• FW: New issue (editorial): Missing attribute/elements in syntax summary in part 2 5.1 (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: XML Syntax Summary in Part 1 (Thursday, 8 February)
• RE: Suggested removal of 2 assertions (Thursday, 8 February)
• FW: Operation dispatch when there isn't a SOAP body. (Thursday, 1 February)
• FW: Message Dispatching Primer Section (Thursday, 1 February)

Last message date: Friday, 23 February 2007 03:17:48 UTC