W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > February 2007

RE: Suggestion on Part - 2 : Adjuncts

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:39:21 -0800
To: "'Ramkumar Menon'" <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <035a01c75162$e73fc730$3501a8c0@DELLICIOUS>
Thank you for the comment.  The Working Group this issue as a CR139 [1] and
fixed it in the latest editor's draft [2].

 

Unless you let us know otherwise within 2 weeks, we will assume you agree
with the resolution of this issue.

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR139  

[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html

 

Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

 

  _____  

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Ramkumar Menon
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 7:21 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Suggestion on Part - 2 : Adjuncts

 

Hi Gurus,

 

The Abstract section of Part 2 defines WSDL 2.0 as follows:-

 

"WSDL 2.0 is an XML format for describing network services as a set of
endpoints operating on messages containing either document-oriented or
procedure-oriented information"

 

I had a suggestion - apologies if its not worth it :-)

Maybe we could 

i) Rephrase this definition,  and

ii) Perhaps have one common definition that can be inlined in all parts of
the spec if necessary. [Primer, Part 1 and Part 2]

 

 

In any case,  w.r.t the current definition, I had a few thoughts.

a) "network services" maybe a non-standard term. The term "web services"
itself cd be used. 

b)  The latter part of the definition states --> operating on messages
containing "document oriented information" ---- the usage "document oriented
information" is not very clear to the reader. [though I can understand the
same :-).] 

 

 

 


-- 
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor 
Received on Friday, 16 February 2007 00:39:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:33 GMT