RE: SOAP Fault code issue

Thank you for this comment.  The Working Group this issue as a CR109 [1]. 

The latest editor's draft [2] adds such an assertion.

Unless you let us know otherwise within 2 weeks, we will assume you agree
with the resolution of this issue.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR109
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html
?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#soap-fault-decl-relate
 

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of youenn fablet
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 3:04 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: SOAP Fault code issue
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Related to MessageTest-1G document, I have the following comment with
> the specification.
> Currently, the soap fault code property can take any qname value.
> It is fine for soap 1.1 but soap 1.2 constraints the qname value to be
> in a set of 5 predefined QNames.
> It would be good if we could put an assertion to the spec stating that
> if soap1.2 is engaged the fault code qname must be in the predefined
> QName set.
> 
> Regards,
>     Youenn