W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > February 2007

RE: Mapping WSDL MEPs to SOAP MEPs

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:52:34 -0800
To: "'youenn fablet'" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <032601c7515c$5e5eca20$3501a8c0@DELLICIOUS>

Thank you for this comment.  The Working Group this issue as a CR114 [1]. 

The latest editor's draft [2] adds a description of binding the
robust-in-only and in-only MEPs to the SOAP 1.2 2nd edition request-response
MEP.

Unless you let us know otherwise within 2 weeks, we will assume you agree
with the resolution of this issue.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR114
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html
?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#wsdl-mep-soap-mep

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of youenn fablet
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 5:45 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Mapping WSDL MEPs to SOAP MEPs
> 
> 
> Reviewing the soap binding, I have the following comments.
> 
> As of today, the SOAP binding defines how to map the inout mep to the
> request-response and soap-response meps.
> The mapping from in-only and robust in-only meps to SOAP meps are not
> defined, which makes difficult or at least not very interoperable the
> use of these two WSDL meps with the SOAP binding.
> 
> It seems that the newest version of the SOAP1.2 specification
> (http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.html) will provide
> the SOAP/HTTP binding with the support of the request-optional response
> mep. This mep fits well with the robust-in-only mep at least.
> It may therefore be interesting to add in the WSDL SOAP binding section
> a robust-inonly mep to soap mep mapping description.
> Concerning the in-only mep, the situation seems less clear. Of course we
> could also bind the in-only mep to the request-optional response mep. On
> the other hand, a SOAP1.2 one way mep is under way but has no support in
> the SOAP1.2/HTTP binding.
> 
> What do you think ?
>     Youenn
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 23:52:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:33 GMT