public-html@w3.org from June 2013 by author

Adrian Roselli

• RE: use cases for figure without figcaption? (Monday, 24 June)
• RE: use cases for figure without figcaption? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: use cases for figure without figcaption? (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposal: modify the figure element (Thursday, 20 June)
• RE: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• RE: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)

Alastair Campbell

• Re: use cases for figure without figcaption? (Thursday, 20 June)

Bob Lund

• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: TextTrack API changes (Tuesday, 4 June)

Bruce Lawson

• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Monday, 17 June)

contact@thecodeplayground.net

• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Saturday, 8 June)

Cyril Concolato

• Multiple metadata text tracks (Friday, 14 June)

Daniel Glazman

• Compositing and Blending / canvas (Wednesday, 26 June)

David Carlisle

• Re: During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? (Monday, 24 June)

Dirk Schulze

• Re: Compositing and Blending / canvas (Wednesday, 26 June)

Erika Doyle Navara

• Week 24 (2013-06-17) - WHATWG patches cherry-picked to HTML 5.1 (Tuesday, 25 June)

Glenn Adams

• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Wednesday, 12 June)

Heydon Pickering

• RE: use cases for figure without figcaption? (Saturday, 22 June)

Ian Devlin

• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)

Ian Jacobs

• Call for Exclusions (Update): HTML Image Description Extension (Wednesday, 19 June)

Jukka K. Korpela

• Re: During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Saturday, 8 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)

Kornel Lesiński

• Re: DRM in HTML5 A Betrayal of Public Trust (Wednesday, 12 June)

Kurt Cagle

• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Friday, 21 June)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Sunday, 9 June)
• RE: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• RE: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)

Léonie Watson

• RE: use cases for figure without figcaption? (Thursday, 20 June)

Mallory van Achterberg

• Re: proposal: modify the figure element (Thursday, 20 June)

Maneesh Pangasa

• DRM in HTML5 A Betrayal of Public Trust (Friday, 7 June)

Mark Watson

• Re: DRM in HTML5 A Betrayal of Public Trust (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: DRM in HTML5 A Betrayal of Public Trust (Thursday, 13 June)
• Re: DRM in HTML5 A Betrayal of Public Trust (Wednesday, 12 June)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? (Monday, 24 June)

Niels Matthijs

• header/footer in header/footer (Monday, 17 June)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: DRM in HTML5 A Betrayal of Public Trust (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)

Pierre-Anthony Lemieux

• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Thursday, 13 June)

Rik Cabanier

• RE: Compositing and Blending / canvas (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Compositing and Blending / canvas (Wednesday, 26 June)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Fixes cherry picked this week (Thursday, 13 June)

Samuel Santos

• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: Multiple metadata text tracks (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: Fixes cherry picked this week (Wednesday, 12 June)
• A new proposal for how to deal with text track cues (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Re: TextTrack API changes (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: TextTrack API changes (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: TextTrack API changes (Tuesday, 4 June)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: use cases for figure without figcaption? (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: use cases for figure without figcaption? (Thursday, 20 June)
• use cases for figure without figcaption? (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: proposal: modify the figure element (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: proposal: modify the figure element (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: proposal: modify the figure element (Thursday, 20 June)
• proposal: modify the figure element (Thursday, 20 June)
• WHATWG cherry picks applied to the HTML 5.1 spec for week 23 (2013-06-10) (Saturday, 15 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Saturday, 8 June)
• Re: <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Saturday, 8 June)
• <subline> becomes <subhead> and other updates (Saturday, 8 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: proposal: subline element (Wednesday, 5 June)

Sylvain Galineau

• [editorial][textarea] Use consistent terminology when describing textarea element values (Monday, 24 June)

Travis Leithead

• RE: Fixes cherry picked this week (Friday, 14 June)
• RE: Fixes cherry picked this week (Wednesday, 12 June)
• Fixes cherry picked this week (Tuesday, 11 June)

wrong string

• Re: DRM in HTML5 A Betrayal of Public Trust (Thursday, 13 June)

Šime Vidas

• During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? (Saturday, 22 June)

Last message date: Wednesday, 26 June 2013 16:05:22 UTC