W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2013

Re: proposal: modify the figure element

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:38:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vn5zkJEsbP+CQ+9u+W6D52b+s79mY4kCHzh9CS=YoJ6Ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mallory van Achterberg <stommepoes@stommepoes.nl>
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
hi mallory,

>I don't know how clear that explanation would seem to the average dev (code
>examples would solve that though).

do you have suggestions for how the text could be made clearer?

--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>


On 20 June 2013 14:33, Mallory van Achterberg <stommepoes@stommepoes.nl>wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:48:31AM +0100, Steve Faulkner wrote:
> > Does hixie's proposed text improve the understanding of how to use figure
> > for authors over what is currently in the HTML spec? if so how?
>
> He's added an explanation for 'self-contained' which is a good thing,
> though
> I don't know how clear that explanation would seem to the average dev (code
> examples would solve that though).
>
> -mallory
>
>
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 11:40:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:33 UTC