W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2013

RE: use cases for figure without figcaption?

From: Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:32:22 +0000
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0CB063710346B446A5B5DC305BF8EA3E7A60D1@Ex2010MBX.development.algonquinstudios.com>

> From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 3:13 PM
> 
> hi Adrian,
> 
> why <figure> in this case, why not <p>?

In short, I don't know.

I mentioned this because I have seen this somewhere in the wild, I just cannot for the life of me find where I saw it (I've been looking).

At the time I tried to understand why <figure> was chosen, couldn't, and filed it away in the place in my head where I store odd HTML element use.

Otherwise I agree with Léonie. I cannot fathom a reason to do this, but I assume that's my own lack of creativity.


> On 20 June 2013 19:38, Adrian Roselli <Roselli@algonquinstudios.com> wrote:
> > From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:24 PM
> >
> > what are the use cases for a <figure> without a <figcaption>?
> Gallery. Not just a photo gallery, but a gallery of samples (charts, screen 
> shots, videos, etc.). In that case you may not want to put a caption with 
> each, but you may want to reference them as "figures" of the work that 
> you do as part of a larger product/service pitch.
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 19:32:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:33 UTC