Re: During HTML parsing, are *all* named character references replaced by their corresponding glyph? from Leif Halvard Silli on 2013-06-26 (public-html@w3.org from June 2013)

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:09:38 +0200
To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Cc: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jukka.k.korpela@kolumbus.fi>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20130626120938144005.34c74243@xn--mlform-iua.no>

David Carlisle, Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:00:02 +0100:
> On 26/06/2013 08:03, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>> 

>> The latter seem to describe this only in the parsing rules, which are
>> rather complicated and confusing.
> 
> Just to confirm that this is in the spec
> 
> there isn't a good anchor for some reason (I should probably raise a 
> spec bug for that) but just after

In the places where HTML5 talks about "parsing as text", I missed a 
pointer to the definition of "as text". May be *that* should be 
included in the bug?
-- 
leif halvard silli

Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 10:10:19 UTC