xproc-dev@w3.org from January 2012 by date

Sunday, 29 January 2012

• XML Calabash 1.0.2 released Norman Walsh

Saturday, 28 January 2012

• Re: using saxon PE instead of HE Theo van den Heuvel

Friday, 27 January 2012

• Re: using saxon PE instead of HE Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
• using saxon PE instead of HE Theo van den Heuvel

Thursday, 26 January 2012

• using saxon PE Theo van den Heuvel

Friday, 27 January 2012

• Re: p:pipeline should make a closure over in-scope variables Florent Georges

Thursday, 26 January 2012

• FW: Aggregating results: hints wanted Geert Josten

Wednesday, 25 January 2012

• Re: Aggregating results: hints wanted Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
• RE: Aggregating results: hints wanted Geert Josten
• Aggregating results: hints wanted Wendell Piez

Monday, 23 January 2012

• RE: Add Calabash to Homebrew Package Manager! David Lee
• Re: Add Calabash to Homebrew Package Manager! Zearin

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

• RE: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? David Lee
• Re: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? Murray Altheim
• Re: Scope? Norman Walsh
• Re: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? Norman Walsh
• RE: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? David Lee
• Scope? Alex Muir
• Re: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? Alex Muir
• RE: Add Calabash to Homebrew Package Manager! David Lee

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

• Re: Add Calabash to Homebrew Package Manager! Leif Warner
• Add Calabash to Homebrew Package Manager! Zearin

Monday, 16 January 2012

• Re: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? Norman Walsh
• RE: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? Geert Josten
• RE: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? David Lee
• why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? Alex Muir

Wednesday, 11 January 2012

• RE: Extending steps Philip Fennell
• RE: Extending steps Geert Josten
• Extending steps Philip Fennell
• RE: p:pipeline should make a closure over in-scope variables vojtech.toman@emc.com
• p:pipeline should make a closure over in-scope variables Norman Walsh

Tuesday, 10 January 2012

• Re: XML Calabash 0.9.44.93/94 released Norman Walsh
• XML Calabash 0.9.44.93/94 released Norman Walsh
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Norman Walsh
• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc vojtech.toman@emc.com
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Norman Walsh
• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Geert Josten

Monday, 9 January 2012

• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Norman Walsh
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc OJ

Saturday, 7 January 2012

• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Geert Josten
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Henry S. Thompson
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Michael Sokolov

Friday, 6 January 2012

• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Geert Josten
• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Philip Fennell
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Michael Sokolov
• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Geert Josten
• [ANN] XML Prague 2012 speakers announced, Call for Posters and time to register is now James Fuller
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Jostein Austvik Jacobsen
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Geert Josten
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Michael Sokolov
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex

Thursday, 5 January 2012

• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Norman Walsh
• Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Mike Sokolov
• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Geert Josten
• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Philip Fennell
• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Geert Josten
• RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc Philip Fennell
• calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc James Fuller

Wednesday, 4 January 2012

• RE: Generating XSL / XProc Geert Josten
• RE: Generating XSL / XProc Philip Fennell
• Generating XSL / XProc Zearin

Tuesday, 3 January 2012

• Experimental Saxon 9.4-based release of XML Calabash Norman Walsh
• Re: Validation... Norman Walsh
• Re: Validation... Murray Altheim
• Re: Validation... David Cramer

Monday, 2 January 2012

• Re: Validation... Norman Walsh

Sunday, 1 January 2012

• Re: Validation, error reports, and printing to stderr Norman Walsh
• Re: Validation, error reports, and printing to stderr Alex Muir
• Re: Validation, error reports, and printing to stderr Norman Walsh

Last message date: Sunday, 29 January 2012 22:06:24 UTC