- From: Alex Muir <alex.g.muir@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:31:32 +0000
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFtPEJb1eBV4wcbQtw7aVZgFQHrp9LEGcdiTR9-NU7YScAQ35Q@mail.gmail.com>
I wonder if there is an issue here or if this is how things are supposed to work? I guess logically I get this error with the following code... E [Calabash XProc] err:XS0022 : No step named "validate-with-rng" is visible here. In all cases except the p:output of a compound step, it is a static error if the port identified by a p:pipe is not in the readable ports of the step that contains the p:pipe. <p:xslt name="schematronOutput" version="1.0"> .... </p:xslt> <p:group> <p:variable name="cwd" select="/c:directory/@*[namespace-uri()=' http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace' and local-name()='base']"/> ..... <p:exec command="java" name="validate-with-rng" .... </p:group> <p:pack name="packer" wrapper="document"> <p:input port="source"> <p:pipe step="validate-with-rng" port="result"/> </p:input> <p:input port="alternate"> <p:pipe step="schematronOutput" port="result"/> </p:input> </p:pack> however i no longer get the error as follows and wonder why step="schematronOutput" is in the readable ports of p:pack when not included in the same group? <!-- validate --> <p:xslt name="schematronOutput" version="1.0"> ... </p:xslt> <p:directory-list name="tiger"> <p:with-option name="path" select="'.'"/> </p:directory-list> <p:group> <p:variable name="cwd" select="/c:directory/@*[namespace-uri()=' http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace' and local-name()='base']"/> <p:exec command="java" name="validate-with-rng" .... </p:exec> <p:pack name="packer" wrapper="document"> <p:input port="source"> <p:pipe step="validate-with-rng" port="result"/> </p:input> <p:input port="alternate"> <p:pipe step="schematronOutput" port="result"/> </p:input> </p:pack> </p:group> // moved p:group following packer so no more error... So then I infer that a scope rule is that what steps occurs before a given step is in the scope regardless of it not being in a p:group and what after is not in scope unless in the same p:group? btw is the need to add a p:group to get p:variable within ones code no longer going to be required in version next? probably this was already talked about on the list.. not recalling exactly.. Regards -- Alex Muir Instructor | Program Organizer - University Technology Student Work Experience Building University of the Gambia http://sites.utg.edu.gm/alex/<https://sites.google.com/a/utg.edu.gm/utsweb/> Low budget software development benefiting development in the Gambia, West Africa Experience of a lifetime, come to Gambia and Join UTSWEB - http://sites.utg.edu.gm/utsweb/<https://sites.google.com/a/utg.edu.gm/utsweb/>
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 10:32:04 UTC