- From: Murray Altheim <murray11@altheim.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:02:55 +1300
- To: xproc-dev@w3.org
On 19/01/12 00:50, David Lee wrote:
> Location and PWD are different.
>
> Simple case, suppose the xproc "file" was served via a URL
>
> http://www.mine.com/xproc.xml
[...]
Another use case just popped up today: we ran into some catalog file
difficulties with file: URLs so I whipped up a handler returning a
URLConnection for a bespoke "classpath:" protocol. So we're now
shoving the entire tree of our catalogs, DTDs, XSLTs, etc. into a
jar file and just pointing to the root catalog. Works like a charm,
is fast and reliable, but it occurs to me (as a summary) that we
*will* be relying on the JVM's ability to resolve "classpath:" URLs
within the jar file, e.g.,
classpath:net/neocortext/xml/catalog.xml
So for our use of XProc and all associated entities, it looks like
they won't be in a database but neither will we be locating them
on the file system.
Murray
...........................................................................
Murray Altheim <murray12 at altheim dot com> = = ===
http://www.altheim.com/murray/ === ===
SGML Grease Monkey, Banjo Player, Wantanabe Zen Monk = = ===
In the evening
The rice leaves in the garden
Rustle in the autumn wind
That blows through my reed hut.
-- Minamoto no Tsunenobu
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 12:03:27 UTC