- From: Murray Altheim <murray11@altheim.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:02:55 +1300
- To: xproc-dev@w3.org
On 19/01/12 00:50, David Lee wrote: > Location and PWD are different. > > Simple case, suppose the xproc "file" was served via a URL > > http://www.mine.com/xproc.xml [...] Another use case just popped up today: we ran into some catalog file difficulties with file: URLs so I whipped up a handler returning a URLConnection for a bespoke "classpath:" protocol. So we're now shoving the entire tree of our catalogs, DTDs, XSLTs, etc. into a jar file and just pointing to the root catalog. Works like a charm, is fast and reliable, but it occurs to me (as a summary) that we *will* be relying on the JVM's ability to resolve "classpath:" URLs within the jar file, e.g., classpath:net/neocortext/xml/catalog.xml So for our use of XProc and all associated entities, it looks like they won't be in a database but neither will we be locating them on the file system. Murray ........................................................................... Murray Altheim <murray12 at altheim dot com> = = === http://www.altheim.com/murray/ === === SGML Grease Monkey, Banjo Player, Wantanabe Zen Monk = = === In the evening The rice leaves in the garden Rustle in the autumn wind That blows through my reed hut. -- Minamoto no Tsunenobu
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 12:03:27 UTC