xproc-dev@w3.org from January 2012 by author

Alex Muir

Scope? (Wednesday, 18 January)
Re: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? (Wednesday, 18 January)
why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? (Monday, 16 January)
Re: Validation, error reports, and printing to stderr (Sunday, 1 January)

David Cramer

Re: Validation... (Tuesday, 3 January)

David Lee

RE: Add Calabash to Homebrew Package Manager! (Monday, 23 January)
RE: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? (Wednesday, 18 January)
RE: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? (Wednesday, 18 January)
RE: Add Calabash to Homebrew Package Manager! (Wednesday, 18 January)
RE: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? (Monday, 16 January)

Florent Georges

Re: p:pipeline should make a closure over in-scope variables (Friday, 27 January)

Geert Josten

FW: Aggregating results: hints wanted (Thursday, 26 January)
RE: Aggregating results: hints wanted (Wednesday, 25 January)
RE: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? (Monday, 16 January)
RE: Extending steps (Wednesday, 11 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Tuesday, 10 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Saturday, 7 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Friday, 6 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Friday, 6 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Friday, 6 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Thursday, 5 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Thursday, 5 January)
RE: Generating XSL / XProc (Wednesday, 4 January)

Henry S. Thompson

Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Saturday, 7 January)

Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex

Re: using saxon PE instead of HE (Friday, 27 January)
Re: Aggregating results: hints wanted (Wednesday, 25 January)
Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Friday, 6 January)
Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Friday, 6 January)
Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Friday, 6 January)

James Fuller

[ANN] XML Prague 2012 speakers announced, Call for Posters and time to register is now (Friday, 6 January)
calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Thursday, 5 January)

Jostein Austvik Jacobsen

Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Friday, 6 January)

Leif Warner

Re: Add Calabash to Homebrew Package Manager! (Tuesday, 17 January)

Michael Sokolov

Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Saturday, 7 January)
Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Friday, 6 January)
Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Friday, 6 January)

Mike Sokolov

Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Thursday, 5 January)

Murray Altheim

Re: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? (Wednesday, 18 January)
Re: Validation... (Tuesday, 3 January)

Norman Walsh

XML Calabash 1.0.2 released (Sunday, 29 January)
Re: Scope? (Wednesday, 18 January)
Re: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? (Wednesday, 18 January)
Re: why not in p:exec ... ""If cwd is not specified, the cwd is the same as the xproc file one is running."? (Monday, 16 January)
p:pipeline should make a closure over in-scope variables (Wednesday, 11 January)
Re: XML Calabash 0.9.44.93/94 released (Tuesday, 10 January)
XML Calabash 0.9.44.93/94 released (Tuesday, 10 January)
Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Tuesday, 10 January)
Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Tuesday, 10 January)
Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Monday, 9 January)
Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Thursday, 5 January)
Experimental Saxon 9.4-based release of XML Calabash (Tuesday, 3 January)
Re: Validation... (Tuesday, 3 January)
Re: Validation... (Monday, 2 January)
Re: Validation, error reports, and printing to stderr (Sunday, 1 January)
Re: Validation, error reports, and printing to stderr (Sunday, 1 January)

OJ

Re: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Monday, 9 January)

Philip Fennell

RE: Extending steps (Wednesday, 11 January)
Extending steps (Wednesday, 11 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Friday, 6 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Thursday, 5 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Thursday, 5 January)
RE: Generating XSL / XProc (Wednesday, 4 January)

Theo van den Heuvel

Re: using saxon PE instead of HE (Saturday, 28 January)
using saxon PE instead of HE (Friday, 27 January)
using saxon PE (Thursday, 26 January)

vojtech.toman@emc.com

RE: p:pipeline should make a closure over in-scope variables (Wednesday, 11 January)
RE: calling for xproc pain points, requested features, etc (Tuesday, 10 January)

Wendell Piez

Aggregating results: hints wanted (Wednesday, 25 January)

Zearin

Re: Add Calabash to Homebrew Package Manager! (Monday, 23 January)
Add Calabash to Homebrew Package Manager! (Tuesday, 17 January)
Generating XSL / XProc (Wednesday, 4 January)

Last message date: Sunday, 29 January 2012 22:06:24 UTC