- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 08:21:41 -0500
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <m24nwfy2vu.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> writes: > That's all well and good, but following David Cramer's recent > messages, I think there's still something missing: how do the errors > get reported? It's not appropriate for the p:try to report errors that the p:catch step catches. I'm tempted to try addressing this with a new step: <p:declare-step type="cx:report-errors"> <p:input port="source" primary="true"/> <p:input port="report" sequence="true"/> <p:output port="result"/> <p:option name="code"/> <p:option name="code-prefix"/> <p:option name="code-namespace"/> <p:option name="raise-error" select="'false'"/> </p:declare-step> It simply copies source to result, like p:identity. If the report port is not empty, then it sends that report to the error handler (I think that'll put the messages on STDERR by default and it allows embedding apps to do something else). If raise-error is true, it acts like p:error and signals an error. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 413 624 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Sunday, 1 January 2012 13:22:19 UTC